Remember that cringe-worthy moment in The Da Vinci Code when Dan Brown claimed the Great Pyramid weighs 6 billion tons? (It’s actually 6 million. Small difference, right?) Or how about Armageddon, where NASA allegedly used the film as a training exercise—not to teach space missions, but to have trainees identify the movie’s 168 scientific errors?

In our age of alternative facts and “do your own research” battle cries, writers face a peculiar challenge: How do you craft believable fiction when reality itself seems increasingly unbelievable? The answer lies in mastering the art of discernment—the ability to separate legitimate sources from digital snake oil, expert knowledge from confident ignorance, and compelling details from convenient fabrications.

---

Your Story Deserves to Be Seen

FROM THE PAGE TO THE SCREEN: Crafting Visual Stories

START DATE: Tuesday, July 8th @ 7pm, ET. Sign up for this 4-week workshop and discover how-to “write for the camera” while revolutionize your prose writing as well. When you master the art of showing character through action rather than exposition, of building tension through what characters do rather than what they think, and of creating atmosphere through carefully chosen visual details, your novels and short stories become infinitely more engaging. Participants consistently report that their prose becomes tighter, more dynamic, and more emotionally compelling after learning screenwriting techniques. You’ll develop a writer’s superpower: the ability to make readers feel like they’re watching your story unfold rather than simply reading about it.

Register today

---

Whether you’re writing historical fiction, contemporary drama, or speculative screenplays, your credibility as a storyteller depends on the quality of your research. Readers and audiences have an uncanny ability to smell BS, even when they can’t articulate why something feels wrong. Get your facts straight, and you earn their trust to take them anywhere your imagination leads.

The Three Commandments of Smart Research

Before diving into the digital research rabbit hole, arm yourself with these three essential principles:

1. The Source Hierarchy: Not All Information Is Created Equal

Primary sources (original documents, firsthand accounts, scientific studies) trump secondary sources (news articles, textbooks, documentaries), which trump tertiary sources (Wikipedia, blog posts, your cousin’s Facebook rant). Always trace information back to its origin when possible.

Red Flag Alert: If you can’t identify who originally made a claim or conducted a study, treat that information like a suspicious package—handle with extreme caution.

2. The Expertise Litmus Test: Credentials vs. Confidence

A PhD in astrophysics can speak authoritatively about black holes but probably shouldn’t be your go-to source for medieval cooking techniques. Real experts acknowledge the limits of their knowledge and cite other experts. Fake experts claim universal authority and dismiss anyone who disagrees.

Pro Tip: If someone’s bio reads like a superhero origin story (“World-renowned expert in 47 different fields”), they’re probably world-renowned in exactly zero fields.

3. The Finland Filter: Trust but Verify

Finland revolutionized education by teaching media literacyalongside traditional subjects, creating some of the world’s most discerning information consumers. The Finnish approach? Question everything, cross-reference sources, and understand that even legitimate experts can be wrong about specific details.

The Golden Rule: If you can’t find the same fact in at least three independent, credible sources, it might not be a fact at all.

When Good Stories Go Bad: Research Disasters That Could Have Been Avoided

Let’s take a tour through the Hall of Fame of research failures, shall we?

The Medieval Accuracy Award goes to every Hollywood film that features pristine white castles. Medieval stone buildings were typically covered in lime-based plaster and painted in bright colors. Those romantic gray stone ruins? They look that way because centuries of weather stripped away the original colorful coatings. A simple consultation with a medieval historian could have prevented this visual cliché.

The Science Spectacular prize belongs to Gravity, which somehow managed to be scientifically rigorous about orbital mechanics while completely ignoring the fact that the Hubble Space Telescope, International Space Station, and Chinese Tiangong station orbit at completely different altitudes and inclinations. Sandra Bullock would have needed several rocket ships and a few weeks to hop between them. Five minutes with NASA’s orbital mechanics database would have revealed this impossibility.

The Historical Horror trophy goes to Braveheart, which depicts kilts, face paint, and the Battle of Stirling Bridge—without the bridge. Kilts weren’t worn by Highland Scots until centuries after William Wallace’s death. The battle was called “Stirling Bridge” because the bridge was crucial to the Scottish victory strategy. Mel Gibson essentially made a movie about D-Day and forgot to include the beaches.

These aren’t nitpicky details—they’re foundational elements that shape how audiences understand history and science. Writers have tremendous power to educate or misinform, and with that power comes the responsibility to get the big stuff right.

Try This: Exercise #1 – The Source Detective Challenge Choose a “fact” from your current work-in-progress—something specific about history, science, technology, or professional procedure. Now, become a research detective: Trace the Trail: Follow your information back to its original source. If you found it on a website, what sources does that website cite? Keep digging until you reach primary sources. The Three-Source Test: Find three independent, credible sources that confirm this fact. If you can’t, either dig deeper or flag it as potentially unreliable. Check the Date: When was this information published? Medical knowledge from 1990 might be outdated. Historical interpretations evolve as new evidence emerges. Expert Validation: Is there a relevant expert you could contact to verify this information? (More on this below!) Time Investment: 30 minutes that could save you from embarrassing errors and reader backlash.

The WGA West’s Secret Weapon (And How You Can Use It Too)

Here’s an insider secret: The Writers Guild of America West maintains an extraordinary resource called “Ask the Experts”—a database of professionals who volunteer to help writers get technical and professional details right. From aerospace engineers to zookeepers, these experts offer their time to improve the accuracy of film and television portrayals of their fields.

While this resource is primarily for WGA members working on produced projects, the page is open to the public and useable by anyone, including and most especially you. The principle is brilliant and adaptable for any writer:

Create Your Own Expert Network:

• Local university professors (many love talking about their research)
• Professional associations (medical, legal, scientific organizations)
• Industry trade groups (often have public education missions)
• Retired professionals (frequently eager to share their knowledge)
• Government agencies (many have public outreach departments)

The Magic Email Template: “Hello [Expert Name], I’m a writer working on [brief project description] and want to ensure I accurately portray [their field]. Would you be willing to answer a few specific questions about [topic]? I’m happy to work around your schedule and would be grateful for even 15 minutes of your time.”

Most experts are flattered to be asked and happy to help, especially if you’re respectful of their time and genuinely interested in accuracy.

Research can become its own addiction. At some point, you need to write the story rather than endlessly researching it. Here’s how to know when you’ve done enough:

You’ve Reached Sufficiency When:

• You can answer basic questions about your story’s world without consulting notes
• You’ve found consistent information across multiple credible sources
• You understand the underlying principles, not just isolated facts
• You’ve identified the few experts you’ll contact if questions arise during writing

You’ve Gone Too Far When:

• You know more about 12th-century metallurgy than your actual plot
• You’re researching topics that appear in one throwaway line
• You’re avoiding writing because you feel unprepared
• Your story has become a vehicle for showing off your research rather than telling a compelling tale

The Digital Age Advantage (And Its Pitfalls)

Never before have writers had access to so much information so quickly. The Internet Archive, Google Scholar, government databases, and digital libraries have democratized research in unprecedented ways. But this abundance comes with its own challenges:

Digital Research Best Practices:

• Use multiple search engines (Google, DuckDuckGo, scholarly databases)
• Check publication dates on everything
• Look for peer-reviewed sources when dealing with scientific or medical topics
• Understand the difference between .gov, .edu, .org, and .com domains
• Be skeptical of information that confirms exactly what you hoped to find

Red Flags in the Digital Wild:

• Sources with no identifiable author or credentials
• Information that appears on only one website or type of website
• Claims that seem too convenient for your story
• Statistics without citations
• “Studies show” without naming specific studies

Key Takeaways: Building Credibility Through Smart Research

• Start with primary sources and work your way down the hierarchy
• Verify expert credentials and understand the limits of any single expert’s knowledge
• Cross-reference everything using the three-source rule
• Build relationships with experts who can serve as ongoing resources
• Question convenient facts that perfectly serve your narrative needs
• Understand the difference between dramatic license and factual error
• Remember your responsibility as a storyteller to avoid spreading misinformation

The Finland Challenge: Become a Media Literacy Master

Finland’s media literacy success comes from treating information evaluation as a fundamental life skill, not just an academic exercise. Apply their approach to your writing research:

1. Question the motivation: Why was this information published? Who benefits from people believing it?
2. Examine the evidence: What proof supports these claims? Is it sufficient and credible?
3. Consider alternative explanations: What other interpretations of this evidence are possible?
4. Acknowledge uncertainty: What don’t we know? What questions remain unanswered?

Your Research Arsenal: Essential Tools and Techniques

For Historical Research:

• Library of Congress digital collections
• National Archives (for your country and others)
• University press publications
• Period newspapers and magazines (many digitized)
• Museum collections and scholarly catalogs

For Scientific Research:

• Google Scholar for peer-reviewed papers
• NASA’s public databases and image libraries
• National Institutes of Health resources
• Professional scientific organization websites
• University research department publications

For Contemporary Professional Details:

• Professional association websites
• Government agency resources
• Industry trade publications
• LinkedIn for identifying potential expert contacts
• Professional development and training materials

And JUST for fun:

• Mind Your Media: A Game Collection of Digital Awareness

Final Word: Research as Storytelling Superpower

Great research doesn’t just prevent embarrassing errors—it reveals story possibilities you never would have imagined. The weird, specific, surprising details you discover often become the most memorable elements of your fiction. When you truly understand your story’s world, you can confidently take readers places they’ve never been and show them things they’ve never seen.

In an era of information overload and widespread misinformation, writers who master the art of discernment gain a tremendous advantage. You become not just a storyteller, but a trustworthy guide through both familiar and fantastical territories.

So dig deep, verify thoroughly, and then write with the confidence that comes from truly knowing your craft. Your readers—and your story—will thank you for it.